I would have had to return social leave for five years if Ruslan Vladimirovich had not helped the judge sort out the controversial issue.
Graduated from secondary special. I got a job, at the same time I entered the correspondence course on the budget. The company kept the average earnings for the period of the session. After graduating from the university, having worked for a year, it became necessary to move to another region. The company categorically refused to terminate the contract by agreement of the parties, arguing that it was not worked out, and the only way to resolve it was to voluntarily return all the funds paid for the period of sessions for the entire training period.
I turned to a lawyer, Ruslan Vladimirovich responded and offered help, answering all questions clearly and intelligibly, clarifying the whole picture. Ruslan Vladimirovich explained the judicial procedure, studied the documents and materials of the case, raised similar judicial practice, based on the Labor and Civil Code, helped to draw up all the necessary documents and acted as a lawyer at the hearing. At the preliminary hearing, the court took the side of the employer. However, having studied the jurisprudence provided by the lawyer and the reasoned objections, the judge took our side in this case.